btzq commented on issue #10445: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/10445#issuecomment-2776350207
@Imvedansh , although suricata is a open source solution, i think we shouldnt limit it strictly to suricata. We should allow basically any network appliance to be used. VNFs are already supported in cloudstack. What it doesnt have is the ability to place it before the VR and set static routes. Thats where the user defined static routes come in to play. So the scope of this proposal should be to enhance cloudstack to allow VNF to transparently route traffic to the virtual router using user defined static routes, on a per vpc basis. Its also important that cloud operators shouldnt need to get involved in this setup as much as possible. It should be self serviced. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
