weizhouapache commented on issue #10445: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/10445#issuecomment-2780645586
> [@weizhouapache](https://github.com/weizhouapache) [@btzq](https://github.com/btzq) Thanks for sharing the VPN solution link. I believe it aligns with the goal of enabling user-defined static routes, which is part of the problem we’re addressing. > Yes, the link is linked to the user-defined static routes. It might be helpful for the integration of Suricata. > However, the solution described in the link doesn’t appear to cover transparent insertion of IDS/IPS (like Suricata) . It seems more aligned with general routing, rather than deep packet inspection or advanced security use cases. > > What’s your advice? Should I proceed with the proposal for transparent VNF insertion (with IDS/IPS focus), or do you feel this requirement is already addressed and no longer needed? > > Looking forward to your thoughts. I suggest you to do some proof of concept, and share the diagram with more setings like - gateway/source nat - routing and routes - incoming/outgoing traffic flows -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
