Matthew Dillon wrote: > The FreeBSD folks have seen a lot of issues with -O2 with gcc-4, so > we need to be cautious.
Opposite is true as well. As all major Linux distros have switched to gcc4, compiling soft with gcc3 isn't tested very well any more. I have reported/fixed several gcc3 specific problems during last year in various projects. > GCC-3 should stay in the tree at least another year, even if we > branch two versions of GCC-4 in-tree before then. Yes, sure. -- Hasso
