stevedlawrence commented on a change in pull request #532:
URL: https://github.com/apache/daffodil/pull/532#discussion_r617604757
##########
File path: daffodil-cli/src/main/scala/org/apache/daffodil/Main.scala
##########
@@ -502,11 +502,47 @@ class CLIConf(arguments: Array[String]) extends
scallop.ScallopConf(arguments)
val info = tally(descr = "increment test result information output level,
one level for each -i")
}
+ // Generate Subcommand Options
+ object generate extends scallop.Subcommand("generate") {
+ descr("generate <language> code from a DFDL schema")
+
+ banner("""|Usage: daffodil [GLOBAL_OPTS] generate <language>
[SUBCOMMAND_OPTS]
+ |""".stripMargin)
+ shortSubcommandsHelp()
+ footer("""|
+ |Run 'daffodil generate <language> --help' for subcommand
specific options""".stripMargin)
+
+ object c extends scallop.Subcommand("c") {
Review comment:
"c-runtime2" makes me think there's a c-runtime1. Maybe just plain "c"
is reasonable, considering
[DAFFODIL-2406](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAFFODIL-2406) suggests
renaming things to "backend-c-generator". The "generator" part is assumed in
the "daffodil generator" subcommand, and backend is also implied. So maybe just
plain "c" is the best option?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
