ruanwenjun commented on PR #11011: URL: https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler/pull/11011#issuecomment-1197505655
> > In fact, I don't think `Fault tolerance warning` should belong to AlertGroup, these should control by `WorkflowInstance` and `TaskInstance`? > > Maybe plugin instance sounds more considerable (more related to alert-receiving)? The original design was sending this alert by group, also per [#10840 (comment)](https://github.com/apache/dolphinscheduler/issues/10840#issuecomment-1179456260) mentioned, I kept using this design. > > Could you please help confirming the right next step? Sorry, maybe this is a historical issue, I just think when the server is down, it will not be `fault tolerance`, since the `fault tolerance` is control by other active master, if there is no active master, the server will not be `fault tolerance` it just down. You can keep on this PR, we can just make this alert as `Fault tolerance`. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
