bobhan1 commented on PR #67292:
URL: https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/67292#issuecomment-6497521657

   /review Please re-evaluate the existing blocking P1 finding: 
https://github.com/apache/doris/pull/67292#discussion_r4344901080.
   
   This issue has been fixed in the current head, 
`b237ebcd675c0b8a6b9a22ab49253d272b318acd`: 
https://github.com/apache/doris/commit/b237ebcd675c0b8a6b9a22ab49253d272b318acd.
   
   `AsyncCacheWriteManager::should_skip_block_writeback()` no longer calls the 
grid-only `BlockFileCache::probe()`. It now calls 
`is_range_downloaded_or_downloading()`, which walks actual cached intervals, 
including historical non-aligned blocks restored after an upgrade. Complete 
contiguous DOWNLOADED/DOWNLOADING coverage skips writeback; incomplete coverage 
proceeds through the existing interval-aware `get_or_set()` persistence path.
   
   The fix includes `SkipsMixedIrregularCoverageWithoutAllocating` and 
`FillsRestoredIrregularCacheGap`. The latter persists an irregular block, 
reopens the cache, and fills the adjacent gap, covering the historical-cache 
restoration scenario.
   
   The latest review targeted this fixed head but still carried the original P1 
in `existing_blocking_comment_ids`. Please trace the updated call chain and 
explicitly reassess its applicability. If the original P1 is fixed, mark it as 
fixed and omit it from the blocking findings. If it still applies, provide a 
concrete reachable call chain on this head that still reaches the grid-only 
probe.
   
   This focus is additional to the normal review and does not ask to ignore 
other findings.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to