gianm commented on issue #6993: [Proposal] Dynamic prioritization and laning URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-druid/issues/6993#issuecomment-461095949 @peferron, > Could you perhaps elaborate a bit more about why the dynamic prioritization scheme based on `periodThreshold` makes sense, as opposed to a `durationThreshold` for example? In our case, users may issue interactive queries that have a small interval duration (e.g. one hour) but are far in the past (e.g. six months ago). I was thinking a period threshold is likely to align with how people often set up historical tiers: a 'hot' tier for the latest 30 days and a 'cold' tier for older data. @Dylan1312, > Instead of using the interval to decide how to change the priority of the query, what do you think about using the number of segments that the query operates over? Appreciate that this mechanism is to be expanded upon in future work but in the short term I think this works better because it more directly correlates with the amount of work a query has to do. Well, same :) Maybe it's worth creating more than one threshold even in the first version. It sounds like there are is demand for ways of thinking about prioritization beyond a 'hot' / 'cold' tier setup. How about starting with the three that have been suggested: period (from now), duration (of the query interval), and number of segments? In this case, if a user sets multiple, I'd suggest applying the adjustment _once_, if _any_ of the thresholds triggers. I don't see a reason that a query that only triggers one threshold to be prioritized above one that triggers two. Concretely the properties would be, - druid.broker.priority.periodThreshold - druid.broker.priority.durationThreshold - druid.broker.priority.segmentCountThreshold - druid.broker.priority.adjustment I think we'll want to add number of rows in the future, but that information is tougher to come by right now (the broker doesn't cache it unless Druid SQL is enabled, and it only lives in the SQL module). So I would still leave that one for the future.
---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] With regards, Apache Git Services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
