paul-rogers opened a new pull request #12223:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/12223


   ### Description
   
   This is a super-simple PR to make unit testing just a bit less tedious. Unit 
test that set up a scan query frequently don't care about time, or want to 
query all time. Today, that requires hunting down the magic incantation and 
copy/paste it into the test. This PR adds a method, `eternity()` to the scan 
query builder to encapsulate that code to avoid the time spent hunting down an 
example (of which there seem to be three varieties.)
   
   The actual test that spurred this change is in another, more complex PR. To 
verify and illustrate the change, existing tests were changed to use the new 
method.
   
   Also include a small dose of code cleanup found along the way.
   
   <hr>
   
   <!-- Check the items by putting "x" in the brackets for the done things. Not 
all of these items apply to every PR. Remove the items which are not done or 
not relevant to the PR. None of the items from the checklist below are strictly 
necessary, but it would be very helpful if you at least self-review the PR. -->
   
   This PR has:
   - [X] been self-reviewed.
   - [X] added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods. Linked 
related entities via Javadoc links.
   - [X] added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths, 
ensuring the threshold for [code 
coverage](https://github.com/apache/druid/blob/master/dev/code-review/code-coverage.md)
 is met.
   - [X] been tested in a test Druid cluster as part of a wider set of changes.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to