exherb opened a new pull request, #12573:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/12573

   ### Description
   
   when we index_parallel with spec
   
   ```json
   {
       "type": "index_parallel",
       "spec": {
           "dataSchema": {
               "granularitySpec": {
                   "rollup": True,
                   "intervals": [
                       "2022-03-23T00:00:00.000+08:00/P1D"
                   ],
                   "queryGranularity": {
                       "type": "period",
                       "period": "P1D",
                       "timeZone": "Asia/Shanghai",
                       
                   },
                   "segmentGranularity": {
                       "type": "period",
                       "period": "P1D",
                       "timeZone": "Asia/Shanghai",
                   }
               }
           }
       }
   }
   ```
   
   the task failed at `partial_index_generic_merge` sub task with exception
   
   ```
   SLF4J: Found binding in 
[jar:file:/opt/druid/lib/log4j-slf4j-impl-2.15.0.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
   SLF4J: Found binding in 
[jar:file:/opt/druid/lib/slf4j-log4j12-1.7.25.jar!/org/slf4j/impl/StaticLoggerBinder.class]
   SLF4J: See http://www.slf4j.org/codes.html#multiple_bindings for an 
explanation.
   SLF4J: Actual binding is of type 
[org.apache.logging.slf4j.Log4jLoggerFactory]
   2022-05-24T10:52:25,778 WARN [main] org.apache.hadoop.util.NativeCodeLoader 
- Unable to load native-hadoop library for your platform... using builtin-java 
classes where applicable
   2022-05-24T10:52:27,524 WARN [main] 
org.apache.druid.indexing.common.config.TaskConfig - Batch processing mode 
argument value is null or not valid:[null], defaulting to[CLOSED_SEGMENTS] 
   2022-05-24T10:52:27,865 WARN [main] 
org.eclipse.jetty.server.handler.gzip.GzipHandler - minGzipSize of 0 is 
inefficient for short content, break even is size 23
   2022-05-24T10:52:28,125 WARN [NodeRoleWatcher[COORDINATOR]] 
org.apache.druid.curator.discovery.CuratorDruidNodeDiscoveryProvider$NodeRoleWatcher
 - Ignored event type[CONNECTION_RECONNECTED] for node watcher of 
role[coordinator].
   2022-05-24T10:52:48,511 WARN [task-runner-0-priority-0] 
org.apache.druid.indexing.input.DruidSegmentInputEntity - Could not clean 
temporary segment file: 
/druid/data/indexerTask/partial_index_generate_xapi-statistics_alaklohh_2022-05-24T10:52:23.380Z/work/indexing-tmp/xapi-statistics/2022-03-23T11:00:00.000Z_2022-03-23T12:00:00.000Z/2022-05-06T02:45:40.447Z/0
   2022-05-24T10:52:48,514 ERROR [task-runner-0-priority-0] 
org.apache.druid.indexing.overlord.SingleTaskBackgroundRunner - Exception while 
running 
task[AbstractTask{id='partial_index_generate_xapi-statistics_alaklohh_2022-05-24T10:52:23.380Z',
 groupId='index_parallel_xapi-statistics_eacjhgae_2022-05-24T10:30:20.878Z', 
taskResource=TaskResource{availabilityGroup='partial_index_generate_xapi-statistics_alaklohh_2022-05-24T10:52:23.380Z',
 requiredCapacity=1}, dataSource='xapi-statistics', 
context={forceTimeChunkLock=true, useLineageBasedSegmentAllocation=true}}]
   org.apache.druid.java.util.common.ISE: Failed to get shardSpec for 
interval[2022-03-23T00:00:00.000+08:00/2022-03-24T00:00:00.000+08:00]
        at 
org.apache.druid.indexing.common.task.ShardSpecs.getShardSpec(ShardSpecs.java:57)
 ~[druid-indexing-service-0.22.1.jar:0.22.1]
        at 
org.apache.druid.indexing.common.task.NonLinearlyPartitionedSequenceNameFunction.getSequenceName(NonLinearlyPartitionedSequenceNameFunction.java:49)
 ~[druid-indexing-service-0.22.1.jar:0.22.1]
        at 
org.apache.druid.indexing.common.task.InputSourceProcessor.process(InputSourceProcessor.java:106)
 ~[druid-indexing-service-0.22.1.jar:0.22.1]
        at 
org.apache.druid.indexing.common.task.batch.parallel.PartialSegmentGenerateTask.generateSegments(PartialSegmentGenerateTask.java:187)
 ~[druid-indexing-service-0.22.1.jar:0.22.1]
        at 
org.apache.druid.indexing.common.task.batch.parallel.PartialSegmentGenerateTask.runTask(PartialSegmentGenerateTask.java:109)
 ~[druid-indexing-service-0.22.1.jar:0.22.1]
        at 
org.apache.druid.indexing.common.task.AbstractBatchIndexTask.run(AbstractBatchIndexTask.java:159)
 ~[druid-indexing-service-0.22.1.jar:0.22.1]
        at 
org.apache.druid.indexing.overlord.SingleTaskBackgroundRunner$SingleTaskBackgroundRunnerCallable.call(SingleTaskBackgroundRunner.java:471)
 [druid-indexing-service-0.22.1.jar:0.22.1]
        at 
org.apache.druid.indexing.overlord.SingleTaskBackgroundRunner$SingleTaskBackgroundRunnerCallable.call(SingleTaskBackgroundRunner.java:443)
 [druid-indexing-service-0.22.1.jar:0.22.1]
        at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) 
[?:1.8.0_275]
        at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149) 
[?:1.8.0_275]
        at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624) 
[?:1.8.0_275]
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748) [?:1.8.0_275]
   Finished peon task
   ```
   
   After review the code, I found intervalToNumberSharesOverride is a 
`Map<Interval[UTC], integer>`, but 
   
   
https://github.com/apache/druid/blob/master/indexing-service/src/main/java/org/apache/druid/indexing/common/task/InputSourceProcessor.java#L104
   
   return a interval as `Interval[Asia/Shanghai]`, which is not the same index 
key and cause the exception.
   
   So, I think it's safe to convert the interval timezone to UTC, so 
getSequenceName will return the right SequenceName instead of throw a exception.
   
   This PR has:
   - [x] been self-reviewed.
      - [x] using the [concurrency 
checklist](https://github.com/apache/druid/blob/master/dev/code-review/concurrency.md)
 (Remove this item if the PR doesn't have any relation to concurrency.)
   - [x] added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.
   - [x] added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods. Linked 
related entities via Javadoc links.
   - [x] added or updated version, license, or notice information in 
[licenses.yaml](https://github.com/apache/druid/blob/master/dev/license.md)
   - [x] added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code 
wherever would not be obvious for an unfamiliar reader.
   - [x] added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths, 
ensuring the threshold for [code 
coverage](https://github.com/apache/druid/blob/master/dev/code-review/code-coverage.md)
 is met.
   - [x] added integration tests.
   - [x] been tested in a test Druid cluster.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to