rohangarg commented on PR #13367: URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/13367#issuecomment-1315122848
I think with respect to uniform distribution, even the round-robin allocation might create holes in servers since it also skips them incase a segment is already scheduled on the server. Although, I've also not compared the behavior of the two strategies. My question was more related to that itself - that given there is `RandomBalancerStrategy` which has been there for sometime, is there some specific reason to not pick it? Also, I think that if `RoundRobin` strategy is considered superior to `Random` principally and practically, we should probably implement that as a `BalancerStrategy` and recommend it over random too. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
