Akshat-Jain commented on code in PR #16781:
URL: https://github.com/apache/druid/pull/16781#discussion_r1687729479
##########
extensions-core/multi-stage-query/src/main/java/org/apache/druid/msq/querykit/WindowOperatorQueryKit.java:
##########
@@ -230,6 +229,13 @@ public QueryDefinition makeQueryDefinition(
partitionColumnNames
);
+ // We need to pass only the window factories for the window stage
definition.
+ // Sorting and partitioning are expected to be handled by the shuffle
spec of the previous stage.
+ final List<OperatorFactory> windowOperatorList = operatorList.get(i)
+ .stream()
+
.filter(operator -> operator instanceof WindowOperatorFactory)
Review Comment:
Currently, we are passing incorrect shuffle spec, and then explicitly
passing sort+partition operators. So we're doing unnecessary additional work.
This PR fixes the shuffle spec, and removes the sort+partition operators.
> there are benefits of further partitioning an existing sort; and that's
rather cheap....
Right now, MSQ creates the stages based on the list of operator factories we
get from `Windowing.java` layer. So logic change for optimisation like this
should happen there IIUC? So it feels unrelated to this PR to me.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
