voonhous commented on code in PR #8418:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/8418#discussion_r1162266493
##########
hudi-flink-datasource/hudi-flink/src/test/java/org/apache/hudi/sink/cluster/ITTestHoodieFlinkClustering.java:
##########
@@ -419,4 +425,179 @@ public void
testHoodieFlinkClusteringScheduleAfterArchive() throws Exception {
.stream().anyMatch(fg -> fg.getSlices()
.stream().anyMatch(s ->
s.getDataFilePath().contains(firstClusteringInstant))));
}
+
+ /**
+ * Test to ensure that creating a table with a column of TIMESTAMP(9) will
throw errors
+ * @throws Exception
+ */
+ @Test
+ public void testHoodieFlinkClusteringWithTimestampNanos() {
+ // create hoodie table and insert into data
Review Comment:
Hmmm, avro does not support Timestamp types in the nanos position as of now.
Reference:
https://github.com/apache/hudi/blob/d6ff3d6ba46b51f58ebb1db58f26423a211741f5/hudi-flink-datasource/hudi-flink/src/main/java/org/apache/hudi/util/AvroSchemaConverter.java#L246
Hence, if you are trying to create a table with a column of `TIMESTAMP(9)`
type, there will be a validation exception. This test will pass regardless of
whether the fix is applied or not (the error message is a little different,
that's about it).
I added this test in for coverage purposes.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]