danny0405 commented on PR #12236: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/12236#issuecomment-2475178085
> @danny0405 Code/APIs aside. > > Actually this is a general idea, not specific to Spark retry handling. I think this design is lot more friendly to pure streaming engines like Flink. Don't you think? otherwise how'd we update larger MT partitions like RLI from Flink. I didn't see there is any gains after this change for Flink, still there is no chance to plug in the Flink RLI operators on the fly flexibly. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
