hudi-bot opened a new issue, #14932: URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/issues/14932
Currently, it's relying on (fixed-size) `ThreadPoolExecutor`, that internally leverages BlockingQueue. In contrast FJP is a "practically" lock-free (locks are taken only when creating new queues, insertion/polling from Qs is lock-free) implementation that is known to outperform all other JDK's Executors implementations. NOTE: We should take this on after migrating to at least Java 11, since Java 8 FJP is known to have issues of rogue-threads getting into eternal spin-lock. ## JIRA info - Link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-2895 - Type: Bug -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
