[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-1292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17397714#comment-17397714
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HUDI-1292:
--------------------------------------
vinothchandar commented on pull request #3427:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/3427#issuecomment-897245071
Yes things will be smoother with multi table txn support (i think thats what
you are referring to, the sync metadata table redesign).
For now, I feel we can outright not sync for cluster and compact, regardless
of sync, async, parallel. We will be out of sync by some actions; which we can
handle anyway.
I ll add that change to this PR if you also agree @prashantwason
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
> [Umbrella] RFC-15 : File Listing and Query Planning Optimizations
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HUDI-1292
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-1292
> Project: Apache Hudi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Spark Integration, Writer Core
> Affects Versions: 0.9.0
> Reporter: Vinoth Chandar
> Assignee: Prashant Wason
> Priority: Major
> Labels: hudi-umbrellas, pull-request-available
> Fix For: 0.10.0
>
>
> This is the umbrella ticket that tracks the overall implementation of RFC-15
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
