sansmoraxz opened a new issue, #3929:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iggy/issues/3929

   ### Description
   
   Currently Iggy supports built-in credentials and external JWT verification 
for HTTP only. A trusted JWT issuer maps all accepted tokens to a configured 
Iggy user, after which authorization uses that user’s locally stored 
permissions.
   
   There is no mechanism for an external service to authenticate a client and 
return its effective permissions.
   
   This limits integration with centralized identity and policy systems, 
especially for service-to-service and device-oriented protocols.
   
   For example, consider a scenario of fleet of embedded devices which support 
MQTT. During `CONNECT` iggy may and resolve its publish and subscribe 
permissions without provisioning a persistent Iggy user for every device.
   
   ### Affected area / component
   
   Wire protocol / API
   
   ### Proposed solution
   
   During client login or protocol handshake:
   
   1. Iggy sends one request to the configured auth service
   2. auth service authenticates the client and returns permissions
   3. Iggy creates an authenticated session
   4. existing operation-specific permission rules enforce the permissions
   
     Sample request (schema too be refined):
   
   ```json
   {
     "transport": "tcp",
     "connection_id": "0195f4d7-57d3-7c21-a711-08a147ad6c90",
     "remote_address": "192.0.2.10:54321",
     "credentials": {
       "type": "username_password",
       "username": "application-service",
       "secret": "<redacted>"
     }
   }
   ```
   
   The credential object can be a tagged enum so other variants can be 
supported present and future, viz bearer tokens, X509 certs, etc.
   
   Example response using session-scoped permissions:
   
   ```json
   {
     "authenticated": true,
     "principal": "service:analytics-ingestor",
     "authorization": {
       "type": "permissions",
       "permissions": {
         "global": {
           "manage_servers": false,
           "read_servers": false,
           "manage_users": false,
           "read_users": false,
           "manage_streams": false,
           "read_streams": false,
           "manage_topics": false,
           "read_topics": false,
           "poll_messages": false,
           "send_messages": false
         },
         "streams": {
           "42": {
             "manage_stream": false,
             "read_stream": false,
             "manage_topics": false,
             "read_topics": false,
             "poll_messages": false,
             "send_messages": true,
             "topics": null
           }
         }
       }
     },
     "expires_at": 1787212800
   }
   ```
   
   Alternatively, the provider could select an existing Iggy user:
   
   ```json
   {
     "authenticated": true,
     "principal": "service:analytics-ingestor",
     "authorization": {
       "type": "iggy_user",
       "user_id": 12
     },
     "expires_at": 1787212800
   }
   ```
   
   A denied response could be:
   
   ```json
   {
     "authenticated": false,
     "reason": "credential revoked"
   }
   ```
   
   
   Decision left to maintainers on whether to follow fixed schema or define via 
some templating language
   
   ### Alternatives considered
   
     - Provision an Iggy user for every external identity: Works with the 
current permission model but creates lifecycle and synchronization overhead, 
particularly for large device fleets.
     - Map each JWT issuer to one fixed Iggy user: Already supported for HTTP 
trusted issuers, but it cannot assign different permissions to individual 
external subjects.
     - Call the authorization service for every operation: Supports immediate 
policy changes but adds latency and availability dependencies to message hot 
paths.
     - Use client-certificate authentication: Suitable for some service 
identities, but it still requires identity-to-permission mapping and does not 
cover all credential types.
   
   
   ### Contribution
   
   - [x] I'm willing to submit a pull request to implement this feature
   
   ### Good first issue
   
   - [ ] I think this could be a good first issue for a new contributor


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to