[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-748?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15007413#comment-15007413
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-748:
-------------------------------------
Github user markap14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/123#issuecomment-157182575
@trkurc Personally, I have exactly 0 qualms about changing it to package
private. If I choose to take some random util class from a release of Apache
Tomcat, for example, and depended on it, I should certainly not be surprised if
that class changes from release to release (including incremental releases) - I
don't think this is any different.
> If unable to find a specific Provenance event, should not fail entire search
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-748
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-748
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core Framework
> Reporter: Mark Payne
> Assignee: Oleg Zhurakousky
> Fix For: 0.4.0
>
>
> We have a case where running with the prov being written to a disk that can
> be ejected. Disk was accidentally ejected while running. Provenance Event
> appears to have been indexed but event is not in the repo.
> Specifically, we are reaching Line 104 of DocsReader:
> {code}
> throw new IOException("Failed to find Provenance Event " + d);
> {code}
> As a result, searching for a specific Component ID is returning an error, so
> we can't search on that Component ID at all (unless we shrink the time range
> to a time when that didn't occur).
> We should generate a warning, and notify the user that X number of events
> could not be found and show what we can, rather than erroring out entirely.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
