[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15198147#comment-15198147
]
Ricky Saltzer commented on NIFI-1636:
-------------------------------------
That is correct, except if your processor hits an exception you did not expect.
The parent class ({{AbstractProcessor}}) eats the stacktrace and only throws
the shorthand exception.
See:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/blob/master/nifi-api/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processor/AbstractProcessor.java#L30
I have a patch and have tested it. Making sure all tests check out before
uploading the patch.
> Print entire stacktrace when unexpected exception occurs during onTrigger
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: NIFI-1636
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-1636
> Project: Apache NiFi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Ricky Saltzer
> Assignee: Ricky Saltzer
>
> As of now the try/catch clause in the {{AbstractProcessor}} class doesn't
> print the entire stacktrace when a processor throws an unexpected exception.
> Printing the entire stacktrace comes especially in handy when users are
> creating custom processors for internal use.
> The difference in information can be seen below:
> *Before*
> {code}
> java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "five"
> {code}
> *After*
> {code}
> java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "five"
> at
> java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(NumberFormatException.java:65)
> at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:580)
> at java.lang.Integer.parseInt(Integer.java:615)
> at TestException.main(TestException.java:5)
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)