[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16060874#comment-16060874
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MINIFI-324:
---------------------------------------
Github user brosander commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/115#discussion_r123743755
--- Diff: libminifi/src/provenance/Provenance.cpp ---
@@ -34,9 +36,24 @@ namespace nifi {
namespace minifi {
namespace provenance {
+std::shared_ptr<utils::IdGenerator> ProvenanceEventRecord::id_generator_ =
utils::IdGenerator::getIdGenerator();
+std::shared_ptr<logging::Logger> ProvenanceEventRecord::logger_ =
logging::LoggerFactory<ProvenanceEventRecord>::getLogger();
+
const char *ProvenanceEventRecord::ProvenanceEventTypeStr[REPLAY + 1] = {
"CREATE", "RECEIVE", "FETCH", "SEND", "DOWNLOAD", "DROP", "EXPIRE", "FORK",
"JOIN", "CLONE", "CONTENT_MODIFIED",
"ATTRIBUTES_MODIFIED", "ROUTE", "ADDINFO", "REPLAY" };
+ProvenanceEventRecord::ProvenanceEventRecord(ProvenanceEventRecord::ProvenanceEventType
event, std::__cxx11::string componentId, std::__cxx11::string componentType) {
--- End diff --
Autocomplete fail, will fix
> Explore alternative ways to supply identifiers
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MINIFI-324
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFI-324
> Project: Apache NiFi MiNiFi
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: marco polo
> Assignee: Bryan Rosander
> Priority: Minor
>
> As [[email protected]] mentioned, we could either increment a value in
> place of generating unique identifiers for any non NiFi related comms ( i.e.
> internal objects, claims, etc )
> Generating unique identifiers is costly and this may not be a cost all
> consumers wish to incur.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
