nuttxpr commented on PR #2850: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx-apps/pull/2850#issuecomment-2473935189
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some sections could be more explicit. Here's a breakdown of why and some suggestions for improvement: **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary clearly explains the problem, the fix, and provides helpful before/after examples demonstrating the change's impact. Including the reporter and owner is also good practice. * **Testing Provided:** The PR includes testing logs (albeit simplified) and mentions NuttX CI, demonstrating effort to validate the changes. * **Impact Partially Addressed:** The impact on `nshlib/nsh_parse:nsh_execute()` is mentioned, indicating the specific code area affected. **Areas for Improvement:** * **Expand Impact Section:** While the affected code is mentioned, the PR should explicitly answer the impact questions (user, build, hardware, documentation, security, compatibility) with "YES" or "NO" and provide explanations where necessary. Even if the answer is "NO", stating it explicitly is important for clarity. For example: * *Impact on user:* YES (Users will now be able to use variable substitution correctly within backgrounded commands in NSH.) * *Impact on build:* NO * *Impact on hardware:* NO * *Impact on documentation:* Potentially YES - if this bug wasn't previously documented, consider adding a note about the corrected behavior. * *Impact on security:* NO (Unless the bug could have been exploited, which seems unlikely in this case.) * *Impact on compatibility:* Potentially YES - If the prior behavior was relied upon by some scripts, this fix could break them. Consider this carefully. * **More Detailed Testing Information:** While the examples are good, providing more context about the testing environment would be beneficial. Follow the template's prompts: * *Build Host(s):* Specify the OS, CPU architecture, and compiler used. * *Target(s):* Specify the architecture (e.g., sim, RISC-V, ARM) and the board:config tested. * **Complete Testing Logs:** While short examples are okay for a quick overview, including more complete logs (or a link to them) is recommended. This helps reviewers understand the testing process and reproduce the issue if needed. By addressing these points, the PR will be even stronger and easier for reviewers to assess. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
