nuttxpr commented on PR #14859: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/14859#issuecomment-2485862964
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although it could be more thorough. While it addresses the core elements, it lacks specifics in several areas, particularly in "Impact" and "Testing." **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the "why," "what," and "how" of the change. * **Identifies Performance Improvement:** The impact statement highlights the positive effect on performance. **Weaknesses:** * **Missing Issue References:** No related issue references are provided, even if none exist, stating "N/A" would be helpful. * **Vague Impact Assessment:** The impact section lacks detail. While it mentions performance improvement, it doesn't specify *how much* improvement. All other impact fields are answered with "NO" without justification, even if true. For example, explicitly stating "NO - No changes to the build process are required" adds clarity. * **Insufficient Testing Details:** "rv-virt:ksnh64," "rv-virt:ksmp64," and "MPFS + BUILD_KERNEL" are insufficient for proper testing verification. It doesn't list the host OS, compiler, or versions. Crucially, it lacks *any* testing logs before and after the change to demonstrate the actual performance improvement. Quantitative data is essential here. **Recommendations for Improvement:** * **Add Issue References:** If no related issues exist, explicitly state "N/A." * **Quantify Performance Improvement:** Provide specific performance metrics (e.g., "Context switch time reduced by X% in SMP mode"). * **Detailed Impact Assessment:** Even if the answer is "NO," briefly justify it (e.g., "Impact on build: NO - No changes to the build process are necessary."). * **Thorough Testing Information:** Include host OS, compiler details, and NuttX version. Provide *actual* before and after testing logs with performance metrics to demonstrate the improvement. Consider including benchmarks or profiling data. More target architectures and configurations should ideally be tested. By addressing these weaknesses, the PR will be significantly stronger and provide reviewers with the information they need for a thorough evaluation. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
