nuttxpr commented on PR #15546: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15546#issuecomment-2590073150
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) No, this PR does not fully meet the NuttX requirements based on the information provided. Here's why: * **Insufficient Summary:** The summary is too brief. It states *what* was changed, but not *why*. What problem did the lock solve? What were the symptoms of the problem before the fix? How does the use of a "small lock" address this? What specific parts of `rx65n_usbdev.c` were changed? * **Missing Impact Assessment:** The impact section only lists a file path. It needs to address all the points in the template: impact on users, build, hardware, documentation, security, and compatibility. Even if the answer to each is "NO," it should explicitly state so. Justify *why* there's no impact in each area. * **Inadequate Testing:** "CI" is insufficient. While CI passing is important, the PR needs to show evidence of local testing that demonstrates the fix. What specific tests were run? The template asks for logs "before" and "after" the change. These logs are crucial to demonstrating the fix and are missing. Include relevant snippets, focusing on the area impacted by the change. Also, specify the build host and target details (OS, architecture, board, configuration). **To make this PR acceptable, you need to:** 1. **Expand the Summary:** Explain the rationale behind the change. Describe the problem being solved. Be more specific about how the change works. 2. **Complete the Impact Assessment:** Go through each impact category (user, build, hardware, documentation, security, compatibility) and explicitly state "NO" or "YES," providing justification for each. 3. **Provide Detailed Testing Information:** Replace "CI" with specific test cases and the corresponding "before" and "after" logs. Include details about the build host and target environment. By addressing these points, the PR will better adhere to the NuttX requirements and be easier for reviewers to evaluate. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
