nuttxpr commented on PR #15828:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15828#issuecomment-2655533231

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although there's room 
for improvement in the level of detail provided.
   
   **Strengths:**
   
   * **Clear Summary:** The summary explains the *what* and *why* of the change 
well.
   * **Impact Description:**  Addresses most impact areas, highlighting key 
changes in build, drivers, and documentation.
   * **Testing Evidence:** Provides test code, output, and a description of 
additional transmit/receive tests, which is good.  The mention of documentation 
build verification is also positive.
   
   **Areas for Improvement:**
   
   * **Summary - How it works:** The summary should briefly explain *how* the 
change is implemented (e.g., new driver using UART, specific files modified).
   * **Impact - More Detail:** While the impact sections are addressed, they 
lack specifics.  For example:
       * **Build:**  *How* does the build process change?  New Kconfig options? 
 Build dependencies?
       * **Hardware:** Which specific arch/board was tested?  Mentioning RP2040 
is good, but the full board name/configuration would be better.  Clarify the 
RN2903/RN2483 compatibility – are both fully supported or is there limited 
functionality for one?
       * **Documentation:** Where are the documentation changes located?  
(e.g.,  "Added a new section to the wireless drivers documentation").
       * **Compatibility:** Are there any known backward compatibility issues?
   * **Testing - Before/After Logs:** The provided test code is good, but the 
"Testing logs before change" and "Testing logs after change" sections should 
show the actual console output before and after the driver was added.  While 
the provided output demonstrates the driver functionality, it doesn't 
demonstrate the *change* itself. The transmit/receive test with Python is good, 
but some snippets of that code/output would further strengthen the testing 
evidence.
   * **Testing - Build Host:** Provide details about your build host 
environment (OS, compiler version, etc.).
   
   **Specific Recommendations:**
   
   1. **Expand the Summary's "How it Works":** Briefly describe the 
implementation (e.g., "A new character driver was implemented for the 
RN903/RN2483 LoRa radio transceivers using the UART interface.  Modifications 
were made to the wireless driver subsystem and the build system.").
   2. **Provide More Specifics in Impact Sections:**  For instance, in "Build," 
mention specific Kconfig options or build dependencies introduced. In 
"Hardware," specify the exact board used (e.g., "Custom RP2040 board with 
configuration X").  In "Documentation," give the file path of the updated 
documentation.
   3. **Improve Testing Logs:** Show console output *before* the driver existed 
(likely an error message when trying to access the device) and *after* (the 
successful output already shown). Include snippets of the Python test code and 
its output.
   4. **Add Build Host Details:**  Specify your build host OS, compiler, and 
versions.
   
   
   By addressing these points, the PR will be even stronger and provide 
reviewers with all the necessary information to efficiently evaluate the 
changes.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to