nuttxpr commented on PR #15854: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15854#issuecomment-2664752693
[**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues) This PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some clarifications and additions would improve it. **Strengths:** * **Clear Summary:** The summary clearly explains the "why," "what," and "how" of the change. * **Impact is Addressed:** The impact section covers several relevant areas. * **Testing Provided:** Testing logs are included, demonstrating functionality before and after the change. **Weaknesses:** * **Incomplete Impact Assessment:** Several "Impact" fields are not addressed. While they may not be applicable, explicitly stating "NO" with a brief justification (e.g., "No impact on documentation as this is an internal scripting change.") is better for clarity. * **Limited Testing Detail:** The testing logs show successful execution but lack details on *what* was tested. Did the script correctly detect different esptool versions? What happened when esptool was not installed? More comprehensive tests would strengthen the PR. * **Missing Issue References:** If this PR addresses a specific issue, include the relevant links. * **Build Host Details Missing:** The testing section mentions "GitHub CI and local build" but lacks specifics about the local build environment (OS, CPU, compiler). **Recommendations for Improvement:** 1. **Complete the Impact Section:** Explicitly address *all* points in the impact section, even if the answer is "NO." Briefly justify negative responses. 2. **Enhance Testing Detail:** Provide more specific test cases and their expected outcomes. Include scenarios like: * esptool installed via pipx * esptool installed system-wide * esptool not installed * different esptool versions (older, newer) 3. **Add Issue References:** If applicable, link to the relevant NuttX or NuttX Apps issue(s). 4. **Specify Build Host Environment:** Provide details about your local build environment (OS, CPU, compiler version) in the testing section. **Example of an improved Impact section:** ``` ## Impact * Is new feature added? NO * Is existing feature changed? YES - The method of detecting the esptool version is changed, but the overall functionality (prompting for installation if not found) remains the same. * Impact on user (will user need to adapt to change)? NO * Impact on build (will build process change)? NO * Impact on hardware (will arch(s) / board(s) / driver(s) change)? NO * Impact on documentation (is update required / provided)? NO - This change is internal to the build script and does not affect user-facing documentation. * Impact on security (any sort of implications)? NO * Impact on compatibility (backward/forward/interoperability)? YES - Improved compatibility with various esptool installation methods (e.g., pipx). * Anything else to consider? This simplifies the version checking logic and reduces reliance on specific Python package management internals. ``` By addressing these points, the PR will be more comprehensive, easier to review, and contribute to higher quality code. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
