nuttxpr commented on PR #15886:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15886#issuecomment-2674076896

   [**\[Experimental Bot, please feedback 
here\]**](https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fnuttx+13552&type=issues)
   
   
   
   Yes, this PR appears to meet the NuttX requirements, although some sections 
could be expanded for improved clarity.  Specifically:
   
   * **Impact:** While the general impact is described, the PR template 
requests "YES/NO" answers for each specific impact area.  Even if the answer is 
"NO", stating it explicitly improves clarity and ensures reviewers consider 
each aspect.  For example, explicitly stating "Impact on documentation: YES, 
documentation updated to describe the new configuration option" or "Impact on 
compatibility: NO" makes the review process smoother.
   
   * **Testing:** While testing on custom MPFS hardware is mentioned, the 
provided "Testing logs before change" and "Testing logs after change" sections 
are empty.  Including actual logs demonstrating the performance improvement 
(e.g., timing measurements) would significantly strengthen the PR.  Also, 
specifying the build host details (OS, CPU, compiler) would be beneficial.
   
   
   By adding the missing YES/NO responses in the Impact section and providing 
concrete testing logs, the PR would fully comply with the NuttX requirements 
and be easier to review and merge.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to