linguini1 commented on PR #17011: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/17011#issuecomment-3286754764
> @linguini1 instead of suggesting searching for CONFIG_BOARD_LOOPSPERMSEC I suggest search for calib_udelay because there is not a page dedicated to CONFIG_BOARD_LOOPSPERMSEC and when searching for it returns many pages. That's fine, I plan to make one for BOARD_LOOPSPERMSEC but it's better to redirect to calib_udelay for now, I agree. > Searching for calib_udelay returned two pages, but I think we need to move calib_udelay from apps/examples/ to apps/system/ because it is a system tool used to help the system to work correctly. And it also will avoid calib_udelay returning in the apps examples pages. What do you think? I don't mind moving it to the system directory but that's outside the scope of this PR. I agree it makes more sense, but I might do it later. Right now I just want to prevent users from making a frustrating mistake. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
