Acfboy commented on issue #18566: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/issues/18566#issuecomment-5269819583
> I have tried running Nano-X, but something has changed: nanoxterm depends on ARCH_HAVE_FORK (at least now), which is not provided by the NuttX qemu-intel64 board. This is because of the recent NuttX fork/vfork rework (commit 70c2ef5911). It no longer provides fork() on systems without process address isolation enabled — the old fork() was not a real POSIX fork, but something similar to vfork. The semantics of vfork() also differ somewhat from the previous behavior. I might need to modify the implementation on the Microwindows side. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
