xiaoxiang781216 commented on code in PR #20644:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/20644#discussion_r4302194332
##########
net/can/can_getsockopt.c:
##########
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ int can_getsockopt(FAR struct socket *psock, int level, int
option,
* a macro will do.
*/
- *(FAR int *)value = _SO_GETOPT(conn->sconn.s_options, option);
Review Comment:
it's better to rearrange the number to avoid the conflict directly, could
you review and try this pr? https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/20713.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
