patacongo commented on pull request #1661: URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/1661#issuecomment-694251298
> I don't know know at this point if it would be better to embrace an external project (with the risks it involves) or to continue maturing our own (even if it is limited). Of course there are also cons about our stack, being authored by Intel one of them. There is a sense in which the existing Bluetooth stack can never "be our own." It will always be third party code owned by Intel. Perhaps we will re-write certain bits of logic, but the overall stack will probably always be Intel's. A cooperative and friendly integration of nimBLE into NuttX "as our own", on the other hand, would probably put us in a better position. It is already ASF code. Justin suggests that this is a possibility if we were to start the dialog. ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
