a-lunev commented on a change in pull request #5434:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-nuttx/pull/5434#discussion_r801259270
##########
File path: net/bluetooth/bluetooth_sockif.c
##########
@@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ static int bluetooth_l2cap_bind(FAR struct socket *psock,
FAR const struct sockaddr_l2 *iaddr,
socklen_t addrlen)
{
+ FAR struct socket_conn_s *sconn = psock->s_conn;
Review comment:
> > should we change all sconn to conn to unity the term?
>
> I think sconn is better, “conn” is a common naming in most files
Otherwise, there is a confusion with tcp_conn_s.sconn field that appears now
in many places. I think conn is better when psock->s_conn is referred.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
