wengzhe commented on PR #11054: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11054#issuecomment-1780438027
> @wengzhe per @gregory-nutt comment > > > Supporting the second address has size/performance implications and probably should be a Kconfig option. > > What is the size hit on code space for this? Can it be Kconfig-ed out? @davids5 I will add the condition `CONFIG_NETDEV_MAX_IPv6_ADDR > 1` in the code to limit the impact on size and performance, and I'll try to figure out the code space when I've finished all the work on this. BTW, unlike IPv4, it's a typical case that IPv6 has >= 2 addresses, maybe the most common trade-off would be between IPv4-only and IPv4 + multiple IPv6 addresses. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org