wengzhe commented on PR #11054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/11054#issuecomment-1780438027

   > @wengzhe per @gregory-nutt comment
   > 
   > > Supporting the second address has size/performance implications and 
probably should be a Kconfig option.
   > 
   > What is the size hit on code space for this? Can it be Kconfig-ed out?
   
   @davids5 I will add the condition `CONFIG_NETDEV_MAX_IPv6_ADDR > 1` in the 
code to limit the impact on size and performance, and I'll try to figure out 
the code space when I've finished all the work on this. BTW, unlike IPv4, it's 
a typical case that IPv6 has >= 2 addresses, maybe the most common trade-off 
would be between IPv4-only and IPv4 + multiple IPv6 addresses.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org

Reply via email to