[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2417?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17177783#comment-17177783
]
Maxim Solodovnik commented on OPENMEETINGS-2417:
------------------------------------------------
Hello [~jorgelondo],
OM has "star" architecture: all streams goes to server (in case recording is
started no additional bandwidth is consumed)
So I see no improvement here :(
Additional disadvantage might be: user device might be limited with CPU/HDD
etc. so recording might failed to start or failed to be created
> Video recording locally
> -----------------------
>
> Key: OPENMEETINGS-2417
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENMEETINGS-2417
> Project: Openmeetings
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Recordings
> Affects Versions: 5.0.0-M4
> Reporter: Jorge Alberto Londoño Giraldo
> Assignee: Maxim Solodovnik
> Priority: Major
>
> Hello, I have been testing other platforms and there is one called Learncube,
> I think it has something that could be applied to openmeetings and that is
> that the recording is done by the user locally and there is a file in
> video.web format.
> I say this because I believe that in countries like mine (Colombia) in cities
> that are not the main ones, the bandwidth is low, therefore making the
> recording locally frees the bandwidth used for the transmission of the
> recording to the server. It would also free up a lot of space on the server.
> That platform has a plugin for Google Chrome. This also avoids the problems
> of recording failure due to small disconnections.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
