siddharthteotia commented on a change in pull request #5014: fixing converting
PinotQuery to BrokerRequest for group by clause with selections
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/5014#discussion_r370769811
##########
File path:
pinot-common/src/test/java/org/apache/pinot/sql/parsers/CalciteSqlCompilerTest.java
##########
@@ -832,4 +849,17 @@ public void testSqlDistinctQueryCompilation() {
Assert.assertEquals(aggregationInfo.getAggregationParams().get(FunctionCallAstNode.COLUMN_KEY_IN_AGGREGATION_INFO),
"add(div(col1,col2),mul(col3,col4)):sub(col3,col4):col5:col6");
}
+
+ @Test
+ public void testQueryValidationFailure() {
+ String sql;
+ try {
+ sql = "select group_city,group_country, sum(rsvp_count), count(*) from
meetupRsvp group by group_country, sum(rsvp_count), count(*) limit 50";
Review comment:
I agree that we should be checking for identifiers. However, I don't think a
query like this:
SELECT State, Count(*) from Customers GROUP BY State, Count(*) should not be
supported.
In other words, we should not have the aggregations as one of the GROUP BY
columns.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
With regards,
Apache Git Services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
