npawar commented on a change in pull request #5934:
URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-pinot/pull/5934#discussion_r488326079



##########
File path: 
pinot-core/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/core/segment/processing/partitioner/PartitionerFactory.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *   http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
+ * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
+ * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
+ * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
+ * specific language governing permissions and limitations
+ * under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.pinot.core.segment.processing.partitioner;
+
+import com.google.common.base.Preconditions;
+
+
+/**
+ * Factory for Partitioner and PartitionFilter
+ */
+public final class PartitionerFactory {
+
+  private PartitionerFactory() {
+
+  }
+
+  public enum PartitionerType {
+    NO_OP, ROW_HASH, COLUMN_VALUE, TRANSFORM_FUNCTION, TABLE_PARTITION_CONFIG
+  }
+
+  /**
+   * Construct a Partitioner using the PartitioningConfig
+   */
+  public static Partitioner getPartitioner(PartitioningConfig config) {
+
+    Partitioner partitioner = null;
+    switch (config.getPartitionerType()) {
+      case NO_OP:
+        partitioner = new NoOpPartitioner();
+        break;
+      case ROW_HASH:
+        Preconditions
+            .checkState(config.getNumPartitions() > 0, "Must provide 
numPartitions > 0 for ROW_HASH partitioner");
+        partitioner = new RowHashPartitioner(config.getNumPartitions());
+        break;
+      case COLUMN_VALUE:
+        Preconditions.checkState(config.getColumnName() != null, "Must provide 
columnName for COLUMN_VALUE partitioner");
+        partitioner = new ColumnValuePartitioner(config.getColumnName());
+        break;
+      case TRANSFORM_FUNCTION:
+        Preconditions.checkState(config.getTransformFunction() != null,
+            "Must provide transformFunction for TRANSFORM_FUNCTION 
partitioner");
+        partitioner = new 
TransformFunctionPartitioner(config.getTransformFunction());
+        break;
+      case TABLE_PARTITION_CONFIG:

Review comment:
       Yes. Seunghyun pointed out similar thing. Discussion below.
   I'll be changing the partitioner to a 2 step partitioner in the next PR 
(have put TODO in code and descritpion)




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to