Jackie-Jiang commented on a change in pull request #8242:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/8242#discussion_r816324320
##########
File path:
pinot-controller/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/controller/helix/core/PinotHelixResourceManager.java
##########
@@ -2963,6 +2961,25 @@ public String startReplaceSegments(String
tableNameWithType, List<String> segmen
return segmentLineageEntryId;
}
+ // TODO: Add more conflict checks over segmentsTo later. For example, for
APPEND table,
+ // if the new segments from 2 batch jobs are overlapping, we reject
one of job.
+ private static boolean isConflicted(List<String> segmentsFrom, LineageEntry
lineageEntry, TableConfig tableConfig) {
+ if (!segmentsFrom.isEmpty()) {
+ // It's conflicted if there is any overlap between segmentsFrom.
+ return !Collections.disjoint(segmentsFrom,
lineageEntry.getSegmentsFrom());
+ }
+ // For REFRESH table, it's conflicted if both segmentsFrom are empty.
+ if (isRefreshTable(tableConfig)) {
Review comment:
@jackjlli We should decouple the logic of lineage from table push type.
Lineage is designed to achieve atomic segments replacement, and we don't want
to mix it with push type which can make it very confusing. If we want to do
atomic full table refresh, we should generate segments with different names,
and put old segments as `segmentsFrom`. Empty `segmentsFrom` means I want to
add new segments without replacing existing ones, and we should allow multiple
of such operations in parallel.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
