walterddr commented on code in PR #10364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/10364#discussion_r1123992574


##########
pinot-core/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/core/query/reduce/ExecutionStatsAggregator.java:
##########
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@ public void aggregate(ServerRoutingInstance routingInstance, 
DataTable dataTable
   public synchronized void aggregate(@Nullable ServerRoutingInstance 
routingInstance, Map<String, String> metadata,
       Map<Integer, String> exceptions) {
     // Reduce on trace info.
-    if (_enableTrace) {
+    if (_enableTrace && 
metadata.containsKey(DataTable.MetadataKey.TRACE_INFO.getName())) {

Review Comment:
   why do we need both checks?



##########
pinot-core/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/core/query/reduce/ExecutionStatsAggregator.java:
##########
@@ -117,6 +118,13 @@ public synchronized void aggregate(@Nullable 
ServerRoutingInstance routingInstan
     String operatorId = 
metadata.get(DataTable.MetadataKey.OPERATOR_ID.getName());
     if (operatorId != null) {
       _operatorIds.add(operatorId);
+      if (_enableTrace) {
+        Map<String, String> metadataWithoutOperatorId = new 
HashMap<>(metadata);
+        metadataWithoutOperatorId.remove(DataTable.MetadataKey.OPERATOR_ID);
+        _operatorStats.put(operatorId, metadataWithoutOperatorId);
+      } else {
+        _operatorStats.put(operatorId, new HashMap<>());

Review Comment:
   with this `_operatorIds` can be removed. 



##########
pinot-core/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/core/query/reduce/ExecutionStatsAggregator.java:
##########
@@ -117,6 +118,13 @@ public synchronized void aggregate(@Nullable 
ServerRoutingInstance routingInstan
     String operatorId = 
metadata.get(DataTable.MetadataKey.OPERATOR_ID.getName());
     if (operatorId != null) {
       _operatorIds.add(operatorId);
+      if (_enableTrace) {
+        Map<String, String> metadataWithoutOperatorId = new 
HashMap<>(metadata);
+        metadataWithoutOperatorId.remove(DataTable.MetadataKey.OPERATOR_ID);

Review Comment:
   no need to remove the key itself IMO. it is not that much of an overhead 
compared to doing a map copy. 



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to