ashishjayamohan commented on code in PR #14385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pinot/pull/14385#discussion_r1833152007


##########
pinot-core/src/main/java/org/apache/pinot/core/query/optimizer/filter/TimePredicateFilterOptimizer.java:
##########
@@ -411,6 +428,80 @@ && isStringLiteral(dateTimeConvertOperands.get(3)),
     }
   }
 
+  private void optimizeDateTrunc(Function filterFunction, FilterKind 
filterKind) {
+    List<Expression> filterOperands = filterFunction.getOperands();
+    List<Expression> dateTruncOperands = 
filterOperands.get(0).getFunctionCall().getOperands();
+
+    // Check if date trunc function is being applied on a literal value
+    if (dateTruncOperands.get(1).isSetLiteral()) {
+      return;
+    }
+
+    Long lowerMillis = null;
+    Long upperMillis = null;
+    DateTimeFormatSpec inputFormat = new DateTimeFormatSpec("TIMESTAMP");
+    String inputTimeUnit = (dateTruncOperands.size() >= 3) ? 
dateTruncOperands.get(2).getLiteral().getStringValue()
+        : TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.name();
+    String outputTimeUnit = (dateTruncOperands.size() == 5) ? 
dateTruncOperands.get(4).getLiteral().getStringValue()
+        : TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS.name();
+    boolean lowerInclusive = true;
+    boolean upperInclusive = true;
+    List<Expression> operands = new ArrayList<>(dateTruncOperands);
+    switch (filterKind) {
+      case EQUALS:
+        operands.set(1, getExpression(filterOperands.get(1), inputFormat, 
inputTimeUnit, outputTimeUnit));
+        lowerMillis = dateTruncFloor(operands);
+        upperMillis = dateTruncCeil(operands);
+        // Check if it is impossible to obtain literal equality
+        if (lowerMillis != 
TimeUnit.valueOf(inputTimeUnit).convert(getLongValue(filterOperands.get(1)),

Review Comment:
   Good catch! I actually made a mistake here. This line should be:
   `if (lowerMillis != getLongValue(filterOperands.get(1),`
   Essentially, in equality predicates it is possible that the literal value 
(`filterOperands.get(1)`) is not a feasible output from `dateTrunc`. In this 
case, there are no values that could be truncated to that literal.
   Consider this example where a specified literal is not on an even 
granularity step (assume that the granularity is the . In this case, an 
equality predicate would be existentially false. We can check this by taking 
the regular `dateTrunc` of the literal and checking if the output is equal to 
the literal itself.
   
![not-on-gran](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/771ea6fe-9eaf-47fe-8a4c-718368b80e6a)
   In the case where the specified literal *is* on an even granularity step, 
like below, we have multiple acceptable values. Specifically, the range from 
the literal to the next granularity step (non-inclusive of the maximum). This 
case is identified when the `dateTrunc` of the literal equals the literal.
   
![on-gran](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/da5fae4d-5b47-4f39-913c-fa9619475390)



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pinot.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-h...@pinot.apache.org

Reply via email to