codelipenghui commented on PR #15757: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15757#issuecomment-1136921453
> Honestly I don't like that much that behavior and I would prefer to let the user modify the properties using an explicit PulsarAdmin function (see https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/15751 ) @codelipenghui do you know why we allowed to override the properties from the first Consumer? Hmm, I'm thinking more about it. The correct behavior should not be the first consumer override the properties, it should be "if the subscription absents, the first consumer will trigger the subscription creation, so the subscription will create with the properties that the first consumer has". The initial position also follows this way. So it should be the initial implementation of PIP-105 missed to persist the properties, causing the "first consumer override properties" -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pulsar.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
