heesung-sn commented on code in PR #21332:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/21332#discussion_r1355814036
##########
pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/loadbalance/extensions/channel/ServiceUnitStateChannelImpl.java:
##########
@@ -503,13 +503,22 @@ public CompletableFuture<Optional<String>>
getOwnerAsync(String serviceUnit) {
case Splitting -> {
return
CompletableFuture.completedFuture(Optional.of(data.sourceBroker()));
}
- case Assigning, Releasing -> {
+ case Assigning -> {
return deferGetOwnerRequest(serviceUnit).whenComplete((__, e)
-> {
if (e != null) {
ownerLookUpCounters.get(state).getFailure().incrementAndGet();
}
- }).thenApply(
- broker -> broker == null ? Optional.empty() :
Optional.of(broker));
+ }).thenApply(broker -> broker == null ? Optional.empty() :
Optional.of(broker));
+ }
+ case Releasing -> {
+ if (isTransferCommand(data)) {
+ return deferGetOwnerRequest(serviceUnit).whenComplete((__,
e) -> {
+ if (e != null) {
+
ownerLookUpCounters.get(state).getFailure().incrementAndGet();
+ }
+ }).thenApply(broker -> broker == null ? Optional.empty() :
Optional.of(broker));
+ }
+ return CompletableFuture.completedFuture(Optional.empty());
Review Comment:
Or, can we skip the ownership check when the ML update fails(if extensible
lb)? I think it can just get the ledger info again no matter what. When the
monitor fixes the stuck state, it should clean the ledger again.
Or, could we expose a new internal getOwner api without deferring
future(this should not be called by lookups)?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
