GitHub user lhotari added a comment to the discussion: Pulsar in Active , Active small scale Setup
Assuming that this is a local redundancy setup and not about geographical redundancy where Pulsar's geo-replication would be relevant. Pulsar standalone shouldn't be considered a unit of deployment. As mentioned before, Pulsar standalone is not designed to be used for production use, but if it works for you, we won't stop you. Instead of thinking of redundancy with 2 Pulsar Standalone instances and having replication between them, a better approach would be to run a minimal setup where there's redundancy using the standard features of Bookkeeper and Zookeeper. For bookies, it's fine to have 2 instances, but for Zookeeper you would need 3 instances at minimum to reach quorum. GitHub link: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/22581#discussioncomment-9222309 ---- This is an automatically sent email for [email protected]. To unsubscribe, please send an email to: [email protected]
