BewareMyPower commented on PR #24745: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/24745#issuecomment-3311176204
In short, using a dedicated pool is okay. Continue using `ForkJoinPool` is okay as well. I'm not against using a different thread pool for Caffine cache only, so I didn't leave a comment or requested change to block merging this PR as well. But this bug of JDK should not be a reason to remove `ForkJoinPool` everywhere. I'd like to hear @lhotari's voice again -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@pulsar.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
