zhaohaidao commented on a change in pull request #5767: Support batch authorization of partitioned topic URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/5767#discussion_r352337822
########## File path: pulsar-broker/src/test/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/admin/PersistentTopicsTest.java ########## @@ -312,4 +316,82 @@ public void testGetPartitionedTopicsList() throws KeeperException, InterruptedEx Assert.assertEquals(nonPersistentPartitionedTopics.size(), 1); Assert.assertEquals(TopicName.get(nonPersistentPartitionedTopics.get(0)).getDomain().value(), TopicDomain.non_persistent.value()); } + + @Test + public void testGrantNonPartitionedTopic() { + final String topicName = "non-partitioned-topic"; + persistentTopics.createNonPartitionedTopic(testTenant, testNamespace, topicName, true); + String role = "role"; + Set<AuthAction> expectActions = new HashSet<>(); + expectActions.add(AuthAction.produce); + persistentTopics.grantPermissionsOnTopic(testTenant, testNamespace, topicName, role, expectActions); + Map<String, Set<AuthAction>> permissions = persistentTopics.getPermissionsOnTopic(testTenant, testNamespace, topicName); + Assert.assertEquals(permissions.get(role), expectActions); + } + + @Test + public void testGrantPartitionedTopic() { + final String partitionedTopicName = "partitioned-topic"; + final int numPartitions = 5; + LocalZooKeeperCacheService mockLocalZooKeeperCacheService = mock(LocalZooKeeperCacheService.class); + ZooKeeperChildrenCache mockZooKeeperChildrenCache = mock(ZooKeeperChildrenCache.class); + doReturn(mockLocalZooKeeperCacheService).when(pulsar).getLocalZkCacheService(); + doReturn(mockZooKeeperChildrenCache).when(mockLocalZooKeeperCacheService).managedLedgerListCache(); Review comment: you can provide this support in the internalGetPermissionsOnTopic function. =========================================================== Is it better to create a new api called getPermissionsOnPartitionedTopic? I understand if I support searching partitioned topic in internalGetPermissionsOnTopic. The output structure of getPermissionsOnTopic will be changed to Map<String, Map<String, Set<AuthAction>> which will break API compatibility? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org With regards, Apache Git Services