cckellogg commented on a change in pull request #6752: Support different docker 
images in Kubernetes runtime of Pulsar Functions
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/6752#discussion_r410738498
 
 

 ##########
 File path: 
pulsar-functions/runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/functions/runtime/kubernetes/KubernetesRuntime.java
 ##########
 @@ -155,6 +158,9 @@
                       String pythonDependencyRepository,
                       String pythonExtraDependencyRepository,
                       String pulsarDockerImageName,
+                      String javaFunctionDockerImageName,
+                      String pythonFunctionDockerImageName,
+                      String goFunctionDockerImageName,
 
 Review comment:
   This can already be achieved with no code changes by implementing your own 
https://github.com/apache/pulsar/blob/master/pulsar-functions/runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/functions/runtime/kubernetes/KubernetesManifestCustomizer.java
   This class allows you to do anything to the function spec so you can set 
whatever image you want.
   
   Is there another patch coming with this? The kubernetes runtime only 
supports one docker image right?. So, If I configured a python image I would 
only be able to run python functions. 
   
   I'm not sure this is the right approach and think the design needs to be 
thought through more. Maybe a more generic structure like a map. That way you 
could have images for specific runtime version java8, java11, python3.7, 
python3.8, etc.. 
   
   Or provide another implementation of the KubernetesManifestCustomizer.java 
that supports images for each runtime (java, python, go, etc..)
   
   
   
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


With regards,
Apache Git Services

Reply via email to