shohi commented on a change in pull request #323: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar-client-go/pull/323#discussion_r474355182
########## File path: pulsar/producer_partition.go ########## @@ -89,7 +88,7 @@ type partitionProducer struct { state int32 client *client topic string - log *log.Entry + logger log.Logger Review comment: Yeah, renaming makes the review scope bigger, but i don't think it's hard to review, it's just a little annoying. The field name using `log` really confuses me, perhaps it's better to open another PR for naming refactor, how about putting a TODO marker first? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org