rdhabalia removed a comment on issue #8056: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/issues/8056#issuecomment-692264867
@racorn > As the resolved hostname is only used as the value of the SNI header field, and not for the TCP-connection (the client connects to the host given in ProxyUrl), I wonder if it should be required that the 'internal hosts' must be resolvable to the client? In SNI-reverse-Proxy, pulsar-client always connects to the proxy-host and passes the pulsar-url as part of SNI header without trying to resolve pulsar broker hosts. Proxy-host which supports SNI-routing , gets the target broker-service-url from SNI and creates proxy between pulsar-client and pulsar-server. Therefore, Pulsar client can only resolve proxy host and client can't resolve any broker hosts. so, pulsar-client does not try to resolve broker-host and passes it to proxy in SNI header without resolving the address. Can you share the stacktrace for your issue? Pulsar client only tries to resolve proxy host so, can you check if you can resolve porxy-host from the client? ---------------------------------------------------------------- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
