lhotari commented on a change in pull request #9448:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/9448#discussion_r586205438
##########
File path:
pulsar-io/kafka/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/io/kafka/KafkaAbstractSource.java
##########
@@ -118,17 +119,18 @@ public void close() throws InterruptedException {
public void start() {
runnerThread = new Thread(() -> {
- LOG.info("Starting kafka source");
+ LOG.info("Starting kafka source on {}",
kafkaSourceConfig.getTopic());
consumer.subscribe(Collections.singletonList(kafkaSourceConfig.getTopic()));
LOG.info("Kafka source started.");
- ConsumerRecords<String, byte[]> consumerRecords;
while (running) {
- consumerRecords = consumer.poll(1000);
+ ConsumerRecords<Object, Object> consumerRecords =
consumer.poll(1000);
CompletableFuture<?>[] futures = new
CompletableFuture<?>[consumerRecords.count()];
int index = 0;
- for (ConsumerRecord<String, byte[]> consumerRecord :
consumerRecords) {
- LOG.debug("Record received from kafka, key: {}. value:
{}", consumerRecord.key(), consumerRecord.value());
- KafkaRecord<V> record = new KafkaRecord<>(consumerRecord,
extractValue(consumerRecord));
+ for (ConsumerRecord<Object, Object> consumerRecord :
consumerRecords) {
+ KafkaRecord record = new KafkaRecord(consumerRecord,
Review comment:
In this case, I don't have a strong opinion since there doesn't seem to
be a common convention for handling compiler warnings in the Pulsar code base.
In general, I think that the Java compiler warnings about unchecked and
unsafe operations should be handled at least in production code.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
