lordcheng10 removed a comment on pull request #13609: URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/13609#issuecomment-1007902213
> Additionally, I'd point out that having very short observation periods is problematic because our current approach assumes that the weight is the same for all `ResourceUsage` observations. Shorter periods would therefore be given disproportionate weight, as the original issue demonstrated. The one downside to this implementation is that a long GC pause might make a period of high memory usage have a lower weight. I think that's okay though. Yes, I agree -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
