gaozhangmin commented on a change in pull request #13890:
URL: https://github.com/apache/pulsar/pull/13890#discussion_r790084927
##########
File path:
pulsar-broker/src/main/java/org/apache/pulsar/broker/admin/impl/PersistentTopicsBase.java
##########
@@ -3264,55 +3264,73 @@ protected MessageId internalTerminate(boolean
authoritative) {
}
protected void internalTerminatePartitionedTopic(AsyncResponse
asyncResponse, boolean authoritative) {
+ CompletableFuture<Void> future;
if (topicName.isGlobal()) {
- validateGlobalNamespaceOwnership(namespaceName);
- }
- validateTopicOwnership(topicName, authoritative);
- validateTopicOperation(topicName, TopicOperation.TERMINATE);
-
- Map<Integer, MessageId> messageIds = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
-
- PartitionedTopicMetadata partitionMetadata =
getPartitionedTopicMetadata(topicName, authoritative, false);
-
- if (partitionMetadata.partitions == 0) {
- throw new RestException(Status.METHOD_NOT_ALLOWED, "Termination of
a non-partitioned topic is "
- + "not allowed using partitioned-terminate, please use
terminate commands.");
- }
- if (partitionMetadata.partitions > 0) {
- final List<CompletableFuture<MessageId>> futures =
Lists.newArrayList();
+ future = validateGlobalNamespaceOwnershipAsync(namespaceName);
+ } else {
+ future = CompletableFuture.completedFuture(null);
+ }
+
+ future.thenAccept(__ -> validateTopicOwnershipAsync(topicName,
authoritative)
Review comment:
Maybe here, We should first check the partition num before
validateTopicOwnershipAsync. if partitionMetadata.partitions == 0, There is no
need to validateTopicOwnershipAsync
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
