RockteMQ-AI commented on issue #10599: URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/10599#issuecomment-4902569864
**Issue Evaluation** Category: `type/enhancement` | Status: **Evaluated** This is a RIP-2 tracking issue for establishing a standardized Proxy Admin gRPC interface surface. The proposal is well-structured with clear motivation, goals, and milestone planning. **Feasibility:** Feasible — builds on existing Proxy gRPC infrastructure **Scope:** Proxy module (primarily), with potential impact on `rocketmq-clients` for admin SDK alignment **Compatibility:** Non-breaking if the admin interface uses an independent port and service definition as proposed **Assessment:** - M1 (Online Client Query) addresses a real observability gap for gRPC clients - The decoupled port/auth/service design is sound - ACL 2.0 integration with `proxy.admin.*` resource hierarchy needs careful design review - Performance targets (P99 < 1s at million-connection scale) are ambitious but reasonable for paginated queries This is a community discussion item (RIP). Implementation would follow the RIP acceptance process. --- *Automated evaluation by github-manager-bot* -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
