pilichoumao commented on PR #5116: URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-dashboard/pull/5116#issuecomment-5947412060
Rebased onto `rocketmq-studio@6a68042f` (only conflict: `catalog_gen.go` digest, resolved by taking upstream and re-running `make catalog-generate`; tool code unchanged). Local re-verification: full backend suite **3,326 tests, 0 failures, 0 Checkstyle violations**; `catalog-verify`/`go test`/`gofmt`/`go vet` clean. CI note, so the red jobs are not misread: this run's results are **identical, job for job, to the trunk push CI at the same base** ([run 36893304649](https://github.com/apache/rocketmq-dashboard/actions/runs/36893304649) on `6a68042f`): | Job | This PR | Trunk push CI | | --- | --- | --- | | Backend Tests (Java 21) | ✅ success | ✅ success | | rmqctl Build (Go) | ✅ success | ✅ success | | Backend Build (Java 21) | ❌ | ❌ (same `binary-license-gate` antrun failure) | | Frontend Build (Node 20) | ❌ | ❌ (same `license gate: build artifact verification failed`, after all frontend tests pass) | | Frontend Docker Build | ❌ | ❌ (downstream of the frontend gate) | Both gates were introduced by #5007 and fail on pristine trunk in GitHub CI as well as locally (I reproduced both against an untouched `0228dad5`/`856b97fd` checkout before this PR existed; the backend one reports missing bundled LICENSE text for trunk dependencies like HikariCP/ST4/aliyun SDKs — this PR adds no dependencies). The jobs that exercise this PR's diff — Backend Tests and rmqctl Build — are green. Happy to help with a separate issue/PR for the gates if useful. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
